SCHG vs VTHRX: 17% overlap

Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF and Vanguard Target Retirement 2030 share 16.8% of their portfolios by weight — computed as Σ min(wA, wB) over every holding both funds own.

Different holding dates. These holdings were published about 3 months apart — VTHRX as of 2026-03-31, the rest through 2026-06-30. Each fund is compared using its most recent file, so any trading in between shows up as a difference.

Hold both, 50/50
1.8Effective Funds

You would hold two tickers and get the diversification of 1.8. Two funds that shared nothing would score 2.0; two identical funds score 1.0.

Overlap
16.8%
SCHG expense ratio
0.04%
VTHRX expense ratio
0.08%

Top shared holdings

SCHG and VTHRX hold 184 of the same securities. The ten contributing most to the overlap figure:

Holdingin SCHGin VTHRXΔ
NVDA11.0%2.2%8.8%
AAPL9.8%2.0%7.8%
MSFT7.2%1.3%5.9%
AMZN5.7%1.1%4.6%
GOOGL4.8%1.0%3.8%
AVGO4.5%0.9%3.7%
GOOG3.8%0.8%3.0%
META3.5%0.6%2.9%
TSLA3.9%0.6%3.3%
LLY3.1%0.5%2.6%

Where SCHG and VTHRX differ

Sector weights as a share of each fund, ordered by the size of the gap rather than the size of the sector — two funds that overlap heavily still usually diverge somewhere.

SectorSCHGVTHRXΔ
Information Technology46.1%17.3%+28.8pp
Treasuries0.0%13.6%13.6pp
Unclassified1.9%13.3%11.4pp
Communication Services14.7%3.9%+10.8pp
Consumer Discretionary12.1%5.0%+7.1pp
MBS Pass-Through0.0%5.7%5.7pp
Financials6.8%11.3%4.6pp
Corporate — industrial & other0.0%4.4%4.4pp

Δ is SCHG minus VTHRX, in percentage points. Sector data is not published by every issuer, so “Unclassified” is a real category rather than a gap in the table.

What each fund holds alone

Only in SCHG
10 positions

1.9% of SCHG by weight, held in no part of VTHRX.

Only in VTHRX
16,499 positions

81.2% of VTHRX by weight, held in no part of SCHG.

A large count with a small weight is the usual shape: the positions one fund adds are typically its smallest ones.

Concentration and cost

SCHGVTHRX
Top 10 holdings57.2%28.9%
Positions held1957
Cost per $10,000 held, per year$4$8

Cost is the expense ratio applied to $10,000; it excludes any brokerage commission, bid-ask spread or tax consequence. Figures are facts about the funds, not a suggestion about which to hold.

Frequently asked

How much do SCHG and VTHRX overlap?

SCHG and VTHRX overlap 16.8% by portfolio weight — moderate overlap. They share 184 holdings. The figure comes from current issuer holdings files (SCHG as of 2026-05-31, VTHRX as of 2026-03-31).

How is the overlap between SCHG and VTHRX calculated?

As the sum of the smaller weight in each fund, over every holding both funds own: Σ min(wA, wB). If SCHG holds a stock at 6% and VTHRX holds the same stock at 4%, 4% counts as shared. The result is bounded between 0% and 100%, and it is computed after looking through any fund-of-funds to the underlying holdings.

Is it redundant to hold both SCHG and VTHRX?

That depends on your goals — we state facts, not advice. At 16.8% overlap, each fund still contributes meaningfully distinct exposure.

What does SCHG own that VTHRX doesn't?

SCHG holds 195 positions and VTHRX holds 7; 10 of SCHG's positions don't appear in VTHRX at all, and they are 1.9% of SCHG by weight.

You probably hold more than two funds

This page compares SCHG and VTHRX. Paste your whole portfolio — brokerage, 401(k), IRA — and see the overlap across every fund at once, plus what you actually own underneath them and your own Effective Funds number. Free, no account, nothing stored.

X-ray my portfolio — free →

Watch SCHG vs VTHRX

We re-read both funds’ published holdings every weeknight. Leave an address and we'll tell you when what's inside actually changes.

Not sending yet — email alerts are built but switched off, and you'll be among the first when they turn on. No spam, one-click unsubscribe.

Related comparisons

Sources: issuer holdings files, SCHG as of 2026-05-31, VTHRX as of 2026-03-31. Weights are fractions of each fund. Diagnostics, not advice.