SWTSX vs VV: 84% overlap

Schwab Total Stock Market Index and Vanguard Large-Cap ETF share 83.9% of their portfolios by weight — computed as Σ min(wA, wB) over every holding both funds own.

Different holding dates. These holdings were published about 2 months apart — SWTSX as of 2026-04-30, the rest through 2026-06-30. Each fund is compared using its most recent file, so any trading in between shows up as a difference.

Hold both, 50/50
1.2Effective Funds

You would hold two tickers and get the diversification of 1.2. Two funds that shared nothing would score 2.0; two identical funds score 1.0.

Overlap
83.9%
SWTSX expense ratio
0.03%
VV expense ratio
0.03%

Top shared holdings

SWTSX and VV hold 405 of the same securities. The ten contributing most to the overlap figure:

Holdingin SWTSXin VVΔ
NVDA6.9%7.3%0.3%
AAPL5.7%6.7%1.0%
MSFT4.3%4.4%0.0%
AMZN3.7%3.6%0.1%
GOOGL3.2%3.3%0.1%
AVGO2.8%2.8%0.0%
GOOG2.6%2.6%0.1%
META1.9%2.0%0.0%
TSLA1.5%1.9%0.3%
BRK-B1.2%1.4%0.2%

Where SWTSX and VV differ

Sector weights as a share of each fund, ordered by the size of the gap rather than the size of the sector — two funds that overlap heavily still usually diverge somewhere.

SectorSWTSXVVΔ
Information Technology32.3%38.1%5.9pp
Unclassified3.4%0.1%+3.2pp
Real Estate2.3%1.6%+0.7pp
Energy3.5%3.0%+0.5pp
Consumer Discretionary9.6%9.1%+0.5pp
Industrials9.4%9.0%+0.4pp
Cash and/or Derivatives0.1%0.4%0.3pp
Financials11.9%11.6%+0.3pp

Δ is SWTSX minus VV, in percentage points. Sector data is not published by every issuer, so “Unclassified” is a real category rather than a gap in the table.

What each fund holds alone

Only in SWTSX
2,533 positions

14.4% of SWTSX by weight, held in no part of VV.

Only in VV
29 positions

3.0% of VV by weight, held in no part of SWTSX.

A large count with a small weight is the usual shape: the positions one fund adds are typically its smallest ones.

Concentration and cost

SWTSXVV
Top 10 holdings33.9%36.6%
Positions held2,939434
Cost per $10,000 held, per year$3$3

Cost is the expense ratio applied to $10,000; it excludes any brokerage commission, bid-ask spread or tax consequence. Figures are facts about the funds, not a suggestion about which to hold.

Frequently asked

How much do SWTSX and VV overlap?

SWTSX and VV overlap 83.9% by portfolio weight — substantial duplication if you hold both. They share 405 holdings. The figure comes from current issuer holdings files (SWTSX as of 2026-04-30, VV as of 2026-06-30).

How is the overlap between SWTSX and VV calculated?

As the sum of the smaller weight in each fund, over every holding both funds own: Σ min(wA, wB). If SWTSX holds a stock at 6% and VV holds the same stock at 4%, 4% counts as shared. The result is bounded between 0% and 100%, and it is computed after looking through any fund-of-funds to the underlying holdings.

Is it redundant to hold both SWTSX and VV?

That depends on your goals — we state facts, not advice. At 83.9% overlap, most of what one fund holds, the other holds too. Expense ratios: SWTSX 0.03% versus VV 0.03%.

What does SWTSX own that VV doesn't?

SWTSX holds 2,939 positions and VV holds 434; 2,533 of SWTSX's positions don't appear in VV at all, and they are 14.4% of SWTSX by weight.

You probably hold more than two funds

This page compares SWTSX and VV. Paste your whole portfolio — brokerage, 401(k), IRA — and see the overlap across every fund at once, plus what you actually own underneath them and your own Effective Funds number. Free, no account, nothing stored.

X-ray my portfolio — free →

Watch SWTSX vs VV

We re-read both funds’ published holdings every weeknight. Leave an address and we'll tell you when what's inside actually changes.

Not sending yet — email alerts are built but switched off, and you'll be among the first when they turn on. No spam, one-click unsubscribe.

Related comparisons

Sources: issuer holdings files, SWTSX as of 2026-04-30, VV as of 2026-06-30. Weights are fractions of each fund. Diagnostics, not advice.