VNQ vs VTHRX: 1% overlap
Vanguard Real Estate ETF and Vanguard Target Retirement 2030 share 1.4% of their portfolios by weight — computed as Σ min(wA, wB) over every holding both funds own.
Different holding dates. These holdings were published about 3 months apart — VTHRX as of 2026-03-31, the rest through 2026-06-30. Each fund is compared using its most recent file, so any trading in between shows up as a difference.
You would hold two tickers and get the diversification of 2.0. Two funds that shared nothing would score 2.0; two identical funds score 1.0.
Top shared holdings
VNQ and VTHRX hold 143 of the same securities. The ten contributing most to the overlap figure:
| Holding | in VNQ | in VTHRX | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|
| CASH | 0.6% | 1.9% | 1.3% |
| WELL | 8.4% | 0.1% | 8.3% |
| PLD | 6.7% | 0.1% | 6.6% |
| EQIX | 5.5% | 0.0% | 5.4% |
| AMT | 4.0% | 0.0% | 4.0% |
| SPG | 3.9% | 0.0% | 3.8% |
| DLR | 3.3% | 0.0% | 3.2% |
| O | 3.0% | 0.0% | 3.0% |
| PSA | 2.7% | 0.0% | 2.6% |
| VTR | 2.2% | 0.0% | 2.2% |
Where VNQ and VTHRX differ
Sector weights as a share of each fund, ordered by the size of the gap rather than the size of the sector — two funds that overlap heavily still usually diverge somewhere.
| Sector | VNQ | VTHRX | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Real Estate | 84.0% | 1.2% | +82.7pp |
| Information Technology | 0.0% | 17.3% | −17.3pp |
| Treasuries | 0.0% | 13.6% | −13.6pp |
| Financials | 0.3% | 11.3% | −11.1pp |
| Industrials | 0.0% | 6.9% | −6.9pp |
| MBS Pass-Through | 0.0% | 5.7% | −5.7pp |
| Consumer Discretionary | 0.2% | 5.0% | −4.8pp |
| Health Care | 0.0% | 4.6% | −4.6pp |
Δ is VNQ minus VTHRX, in percentage points. Sector data is not published by every issuer, so “Unclassified” is a real category rather than a gap in the table.
What each fund holds alone
14.5% of VNQ by weight, held in no part of VTHRX.
97.2% of VTHRX by weight, held in no part of VNQ.
A large count with a small weight is the usual shape: the positions one fund adds are typically its smallest ones.
Concentration and cost
| VNQ | VTHRX | |
|---|---|---|
| Top 10 holdings | 54.1% | 28.9% |
| Positions held | 145 | 7 |
| Cost per $10,000 held, per year | $13 | $8 |
Cost is the expense ratio applied to $10,000; it excludes any brokerage commission, bid-ask spread or tax consequence. Figures are facts about the funds, not a suggestion about which to hold.
Frequently asked
How much do VNQ and VTHRX overlap?
VNQ and VTHRX overlap 1.4% by portfolio weight — largely distinct portfolios. They share 143 holdings. The figure comes from current issuer holdings files (VNQ as of 2026-06-30, VTHRX as of 2026-03-31).
How is the overlap between VNQ and VTHRX calculated?
As the sum of the smaller weight in each fund, over every holding both funds own: Σ min(wA, wB). If VNQ holds a stock at 6% and VTHRX holds the same stock at 4%, 4% counts as shared. The result is bounded between 0% and 100%, and it is computed after looking through any fund-of-funds to the underlying holdings.
Is it redundant to hold both VNQ and VTHRX?
That depends on your goals — we state facts, not advice. At 1.4% overlap, each fund still contributes meaningfully distinct exposure.
What does VNQ own that VTHRX doesn't?
VNQ holds 145 positions and VTHRX holds 7; 2 of VNQ's positions don't appear in VTHRX at all, and they are 14.5% of VNQ by weight.
You probably hold more than two funds
This page compares VNQ and VTHRX. Paste your whole portfolio — brokerage, 401(k), IRA — and see the overlap across every fund at once, plus what you actually own underneath them and your own Effective Funds number. Free, no account, nothing stored.
X-ray my portfolio — free →Watch VNQ vs VTHRX
We re-read both funds’ published holdings every weeknight. Leave an address and we'll tell you when what's inside actually changes.
Not sending yet — email alerts are built but switched off, and you'll be among the first when they turn on. No spam, one-click unsubscribe.
Related comparisons
Sources: issuer holdings files, VNQ as of 2026-06-30, VTHRX as of 2026-03-31. Weights are fractions of each fund. Diagnostics, not advice.