VTHRX vs VTTHX: 92% overlap

Vanguard Target Retirement 2030 and Vanguard Target Retirement 2035 share 92.4% of their portfolios by weight — computed as Σ min(wA, wB) over every holding both funds own.

Different holding dates. These holdings were published about 3 months apart — VTHRX, VTTHX as of 2026-03-31, the rest through 2026-06-30. Each fund is compared using its most recent file, so any trading in between shows up as a difference.

Hold both, 50/50
1.1Effective Funds

You would hold two tickers and get the diversification of 1.1. Two funds that shared nothing would score 2.0; two identical funds score 1.0.

Overlap
92.4%
VTHRX expense ratio
0.08%
VTTHX expense ratio
0.08%

Top shared holdings

VTHRX and VTTHX hold 16,682 of the same securities. The ten contributing most to the overlap figure:

Holdingin VTHRXin VTTHXΔ
UST-3-10Y6.0%4.9%1.1%
AGENCY-MBS5.7%4.7%1.0%
UST-0-3Y4.7%3.9%0.8%
UST-10Y+2.9%2.4%0.5%
NVDA2.2%2.5%0.3%
AAPL2.0%2.3%0.3%
CASH1.9%1.9%0.0%
MSFT1.3%1.5%0.2%
AMZN1.1%1.2%0.1%
23301.0%1.2%0.1%

Where VTHRX and VTTHX differ

Sector weights as a share of each fund, ordered by the size of the gap rather than the size of the sector — two funds that overlap heavily still usually diverge somewhere.

SectorVTHRXVTTHXΔ
Treasuries13.6%11.2%+2.4pp
Information Technology17.3%19.5%2.3pp
Unclassified13.3%11.2%+2.1pp
MBS Pass-Through5.7%4.7%+1.0pp
Industrials6.9%7.8%0.9pp
Corporate — industrial & other4.4%3.6%+0.8pp
Financials11.3%12.0%0.7pp
Consumer Discretionary5.0%5.7%0.6pp

Δ is VTHRX minus VTTHX, in percentage points. Sector data is not published by every issuer, so “Unclassified” is a real category rather than a gap in the table.

What each fund holds alone

Only in VTHRX
1 positions

0.4% of VTHRX by weight, held in no part of VTTHX.

Only in VTTHX
0 positions

0.0% of VTTHX by weight, held in no part of VTHRX.

A large count with a small weight is the usual shape: the positions one fund adds are typically its smallest ones.

Concentration and cost

VTHRXVTTHX
Top 10 holdings28.9%26.4%
Positions held76
Cost per $10,000 held, per year$8$8

Cost is the expense ratio applied to $10,000; it excludes any brokerage commission, bid-ask spread or tax consequence. Figures are facts about the funds, not a suggestion about which to hold.

Frequently asked

How much do VTHRX and VTTHX overlap?

VTHRX and VTTHX overlap 92.4% by portfolio weight — they are effectively the same fund. They share 16,682 holdings. The figure comes from current issuer holdings files (VTHRX as of 2026-03-31, VTTHX as of 2026-03-31).

How is the overlap between VTHRX and VTTHX calculated?

As the sum of the smaller weight in each fund, over every holding both funds own: Σ min(wA, wB). If VTHRX holds a stock at 6% and VTTHX holds the same stock at 4%, 4% counts as shared. The result is bounded between 0% and 100%, and it is computed after looking through any fund-of-funds to the underlying holdings.

Is it redundant to hold both VTHRX and VTTHX?

That depends on your goals — we state facts, not advice. At 92.4% overlap, most of what one fund holds, the other holds too. Expense ratios: VTHRX 0.08% versus VTTHX 0.08%.

What does VTHRX own that VTTHX doesn't?

VTHRX holds 7 positions and VTTHX holds 6; 1 of VTHRX's positions don't appear in VTTHX at all, and they are 0.4% of VTHRX by weight.

You probably hold more than two funds

This page compares VTHRX and VTTHX. Paste your whole portfolio — brokerage, 401(k), IRA — and see the overlap across every fund at once, plus what you actually own underneath them and your own Effective Funds number. Free, no account, nothing stored.

X-ray my portfolio — free →

Watch VTHRX vs VTTHX

We re-read both funds’ published holdings every weeknight. Leave an address and we'll tell you when what's inside actually changes.

Not sending yet — email alerts are built but switched off, and you'll be among the first when they turn on. No spam, one-click unsubscribe.

Related comparisons

Sources: issuer holdings files, VTHRX as of 2026-03-31, VTTHX as of 2026-03-31. Weights are fractions of each fund. Diagnostics, not advice.