VTHRX vs VV: 31% overlap
Vanguard Target Retirement 2030 and Vanguard Large-Cap ETF share 31.1% of their portfolios by weight — computed as Σ min(wA, wB) over every holding both funds own.
Different holding dates. These holdings were published about 3 months apart — VTHRX as of 2026-03-31, the rest through 2026-06-30. Each fund is compared using its most recent file, so any trading in between shows up as a difference.
You would hold two tickers and get the diversification of 1.7. Two funds that shared nothing would score 2.0; two identical funds score 1.0.
Top shared holdings
VTHRX and VV hold 434 of the same securities. The ten contributing most to the overlap figure:
| Holding | in VTHRX | in VV | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDA | 2.2% | 7.3% | 5.1% |
| AAPL | 2.0% | 6.7% | 4.7% |
| MSFT | 1.3% | 4.4% | 3.1% |
| AMZN | 1.1% | 3.6% | 2.5% |
| GOOGL | 1.0% | 3.3% | 2.3% |
| AVGO | 0.9% | 2.8% | 2.0% |
| GOOG | 0.8% | 2.6% | 1.8% |
| MU | 0.6% | 2.1% | 1.4% |
| META | 0.6% | 2.0% | 1.4% |
| TSLA | 0.6% | 1.9% | 1.3% |
Where VTHRX and VV differ
Sector weights as a share of each fund, ordered by the size of the gap rather than the size of the sector — two funds that overlap heavily still usually diverge somewhere.
| Sector | VTHRX | VV | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Information Technology | 17.3% | 38.1% | −20.9pp |
| Treasuries | 13.6% | 0.0% | +13.6pp |
| Unclassified | 13.3% | 0.1% | +13.2pp |
| Communication Services | 3.9% | 10.0% | −6.0pp |
| MBS Pass-Through | 5.7% | 0.0% | +5.7pp |
| Corporate — industrial & other | 4.4% | 0.0% | +4.4pp |
| Health Care | 4.6% | 8.9% | −4.3pp |
| Consumer Discretionary | 5.0% | 9.1% | −4.1pp |
Δ is VTHRX minus VV, in percentage points. Sector data is not published by every issuer, so “Unclassified” is a real category rather than a gap in the table.
What each fund holds alone
67.2% of VTHRX by weight, held in no part of VV.
0.0% of VV by weight, held in no part of VTHRX.
A large count with a small weight is the usual shape: the positions one fund adds are typically its smallest ones.
Concentration and cost
| VTHRX | VV | |
|---|---|---|
| Top 10 holdings | 28.9% | 36.6% |
| Positions held | 7 | 434 |
| Cost per $10,000 held, per year | $8 | $3 |
Cost is the expense ratio applied to $10,000; it excludes any brokerage commission, bid-ask spread or tax consequence. Figures are facts about the funds, not a suggestion about which to hold.
Frequently asked
How much do VTHRX and VV overlap?
VTHRX and VV overlap 31.1% by portfolio weight — moderate overlap. They share 434 holdings. The figure comes from current issuer holdings files (VTHRX as of 2026-03-31, VV as of 2026-06-30).
How is the overlap between VTHRX and VV calculated?
As the sum of the smaller weight in each fund, over every holding both funds own: Σ min(wA, wB). If VTHRX holds a stock at 6% and VV holds the same stock at 4%, 4% counts as shared. The result is bounded between 0% and 100%, and it is computed after looking through any fund-of-funds to the underlying holdings.
Is it redundant to hold both VTHRX and VV?
That depends on your goals — we state facts, not advice. At 31.1% overlap, each fund still contributes meaningfully distinct exposure.
What does VTHRX own that VV doesn't?
VTHRX holds 7 positions and VV holds 434; 16,249 of VTHRX's positions don't appear in VV at all, and they are 67.2% of VTHRX by weight.
You probably hold more than two funds
This page compares VTHRX and VV. Paste your whole portfolio — brokerage, 401(k), IRA — and see the overlap across every fund at once, plus what you actually own underneath them and your own Effective Funds number. Free, no account, nothing stored.
X-ray my portfolio — free →Watch VTHRX vs VV
We re-read both funds’ published holdings every weeknight. Leave an address and we'll tell you when what's inside actually changes.
Not sending yet — email alerts are built but switched off, and you'll be among the first when they turn on. No spam, one-click unsubscribe.
Related comparisons
Sources: issuer holdings files, VTHRX as of 2026-03-31, VV as of 2026-06-30. Weights are fractions of each fund. Diagnostics, not advice.