VWO vs XLY: 0% overlap
Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF and Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR Fund share 0.1% of their portfolios by weight — computed as Σ min(wA, wB) over every holding both funds own.
You would hold two tickers and get the diversification of 2.0. Two funds that shared nothing would score 2.0; two identical funds score 1.0.
Top shared holdings
VWO and XLY hold 3 of the same securities. The ten contributing most to the overlap figure:
| Holding | in VWO | in XLY | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|
| CASH | 4.2% | 0.1% | 4.1% |
| CCL | 0.0% | 0.9% | 0.9% |
| LULU | 0.0% | 0.3% | 0.3% |
Where VWO and XLY differ
Sector weights as a share of each fund, ordered by the size of the gap rather than the size of the sector — two funds that overlap heavily still usually diverge somewhere.
| Sector | VWO | XLY | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Consumer Discretionary | 7.9% | 99.9% | −92.0pp |
| Information Technology | 31.6% | 0.0% | +31.6pp |
| Financials | 17.2% | 0.0% | +17.2pp |
| Unclassified | 9.3% | 0.0% | +9.3pp |
| Industrials | 5.9% | 0.0% | +5.9pp |
| Materials | 5.7% | 0.0% | +5.7pp |
| Communication Services | 5.4% | 0.0% | +5.4pp |
| Cash and/or Derivatives | 4.2% | 0.1% | +4.1pp |
Δ is VWO minus XLY, in percentage points. Sector data is not published by every issuer, so “Unclassified” is a real category rather than a gap in the table.
What each fund holds alone
95.8% of VWO by weight, held in no part of XLY.
98.7% of XLY by weight, held in no part of VWO.
A large count with a small weight is the usual shape: the positions one fund adds are typically its smallest ones.
Concentration and cost
| VWO | XLY | |
|---|---|---|
| Top 10 holdings | 30.3% | 68.0% |
| Positions held | 5,003 | 49 |
| Cost per $10,000 held, per year | $6 | $8 |
Cost is the expense ratio applied to $10,000; it excludes any brokerage commission, bid-ask spread or tax consequence. Figures are facts about the funds, not a suggestion about which to hold.
Frequently asked
How much do VWO and XLY overlap?
VWO and XLY overlap 0.1% by portfolio weight — largely distinct portfolios. They share 3 holdings. The figure comes from current issuer holdings files (VWO as of 2026-06-30, XLY as of 2026-07-23).
How is the overlap between VWO and XLY calculated?
As the sum of the smaller weight in each fund, over every holding both funds own: Σ min(wA, wB). If VWO holds a stock at 6% and XLY holds the same stock at 4%, 4% counts as shared. The result is bounded between 0% and 100%, and it is computed after looking through any fund-of-funds to the underlying holdings.
Is it redundant to hold both VWO and XLY?
That depends on your goals — we state facts, not advice. At 0.1% overlap, each fund still contributes meaningfully distinct exposure.
What does VWO own that XLY doesn't?
VWO holds 5,003 positions and XLY holds 49; 5,000 of VWO's positions don't appear in XLY at all, and they are 95.8% of VWO by weight.
You probably hold more than two funds
This page compares VWO and XLY. Paste your whole portfolio — brokerage, 401(k), IRA — and see the overlap across every fund at once, plus what you actually own underneath them and your own Effective Funds number. Free, no account, nothing stored.
X-ray my portfolio — free →Watch VWO vs XLY
We re-read both funds’ published holdings every weeknight. Leave an address and we'll tell you when what's inside actually changes.
Not sending yet — email alerts are built but switched off, and you'll be among the first when they turn on. No spam, one-click unsubscribe.
Related comparisons
Sources: issuer holdings files, VWO as of 2026-06-30, XLY as of 2026-07-23. Weights are fractions of each fund. Diagnostics, not advice.