BND vs SWAGX: 45% overlap
Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF and Schwab U.S. Aggregate Bond Index share 45.4% of their portfolios by weight — computed as Σ min(wA, wB) over every holding both funds own.
Different holding dates. These holdings were published about 4 months apart — SWAGX as of 2026-02-28, the rest through 2026-06-30. Each fund is compared using its most recent file, so any trading in between shows up as a difference.
You would hold two tickers and get the diversification of 1.5. Two funds that shared nothing would score 2.0; two identical funds score 1.0.
Top shared holdings
BND and SWAGX hold 1,449 of the same securities. The ten contributing most to the overlap figure:
| Holding | in BND | in SWAGX | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|
| AGENCY-MBS | 20.3% | 19.2% | 1.1% |
| CASH | 1.1% | 2.1% | 1.0% |
| 46647P | 0.6% | 0.5% | 0.1% |
| 06051G | 0.5% | 0.5% | 0.0% |
| 459058 | 0.4% | 0.3% | 0.0% |
| 298785 | 0.3% | 0.3% | 0.0% |
| 38141G | 0.3% | 0.3% | 0.0% |
| 68389X | 0.3% | 0.3% | 0.1% |
| 95000U | 0.3% | 0.3% | 0.0% |
| 404280 | 0.3% | 0.3% | 0.0% |
Where BND and SWAGX differ
Sector weights as a share of each fund, ordered by the size of the gap rather than the size of the sector — two funds that overlap heavily still usually diverge somewhere.
| Sector | BND | SWAGX | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Unclassified | 0.7% | 6.5% | −5.8pp |
| Treasuries | 48.2% | 45.7% | +2.5pp |
| Corporate — industrial & other | 14.6% | 13.3% | +1.4pp |
| MBS Pass-Through | 20.3% | 19.2% | +1.1pp |
| Cash and/or Derivatives | 1.1% | 2.1% | −1.0pp |
| Financials | 7.9% | 7.5% | +0.4pp |
| Utilities | 2.6% | 2.3% | +0.3pp |
| ABS | 0.3% | 0.0% | +0.3pp |
Δ is BND minus SWAGX, in percentage points. Sector data is not published by every issuer, so “Unclassified” is a real category rather than a gap in the table.
What each fund holds alone
49.7% of BND by weight, held in no part of SWAGX.
51.9% of SWAGX by weight, held in no part of BND.
A large count with a small weight is the usual shape: the positions one fund adds are typically its smallest ones.
Concentration and cost
| BND | SWAGX | |
|---|---|---|
| Top 10 holdings | 71.7% | 71.4% |
| Positions held | 2,047 | 1,604 |
| Cost per $10,000 held, per year | $3 | $4 |
Cost is the expense ratio applied to $10,000; it excludes any brokerage commission, bid-ask spread or tax consequence. Figures are facts about the funds, not a suggestion about which to hold.
Frequently asked
How much do BND and SWAGX overlap?
BND and SWAGX overlap 45.4% by portfolio weight — moderate overlap. They share 1,449 holdings. The figure comes from current issuer holdings files (BND as of 2026-06-30, SWAGX as of 2026-02-28).
How is the overlap between BND and SWAGX calculated?
As the sum of the smaller weight in each fund, over every holding both funds own: Σ min(wA, wB). If BND holds a stock at 6% and SWAGX holds the same stock at 4%, 4% counts as shared. The result is bounded between 0% and 100%, and it is computed after looking through any fund-of-funds to the underlying holdings.
Is it redundant to hold both BND and SWAGX?
That depends on your goals — we state facts, not advice. At 45.4% overlap, each fund still contributes meaningfully distinct exposure.
What does BND own that SWAGX doesn't?
BND holds 2,047 positions and SWAGX holds 1,604; 598 of BND's positions don't appear in SWAGX at all, and they are 49.7% of BND by weight.
You probably hold more than two funds
This page compares BND and SWAGX. Paste your whole portfolio — brokerage, 401(k), IRA — and see the overlap across every fund at once, plus what you actually own underneath them and your own Effective Funds number. Free, no account, nothing stored.
X-ray my portfolio — free →Watch BND vs SWAGX
We re-read both funds’ published holdings every weeknight. Leave an address and we'll tell you when what's inside actually changes.
Not sending yet — email alerts are built but switched off, and you'll be among the first when they turn on. No spam, one-click unsubscribe.
Related comparisons
Sources: issuer holdings files, BND as of 2026-06-30, SWAGX as of 2026-02-28. Weights are fractions of each fund. Diagnostics, not advice.