SWAGX vs VTI: 1% overlap

Schwab U.S. Aggregate Bond Index and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF share 0.6% of their portfolios by weight — computed as Σ min(wA, wB) over every holding both funds own.

Different holding dates. These holdings were published about 4 months apart — SWAGX as of 2026-02-28, the rest through 2026-06-30. Each fund is compared using its most recent file, so any trading in between shows up as a difference.

Hold both, 50/50
2.0Effective Funds

You would hold two tickers and get the diversification of 2.0. Two funds that shared nothing would score 2.0; two identical funds score 1.0.

Overlap
0.6%
SWAGX expense ratio
0.04%
VTI expense ratio
0.03%

Top shared holdings

SWAGX and VTI hold 1 of the same securities. The ten contributing most to the overlap figure:

Holdingin SWAGXin VTIΔ
CASH2.1%0.6%1.4%

Where SWAGX and VTI differ

Sector weights as a share of each fund, ordered by the size of the gap rather than the size of the sector — two funds that overlap heavily still usually diverge somewhere.

SectorSWAGXVTIΔ
Treasuries45.7%0.0%+45.7pp
Information Technology0.0%35.2%35.2pp
MBS Pass-Through19.2%0.0%+19.2pp
Corporate — industrial & other13.3%0.0%+13.3pp
Industrials0.0%10.4%10.4pp
Health Care0.0%9.5%9.5pp
Consumer Discretionary0.0%9.2%9.2pp
Communication Services0.0%9.1%9.1pp

Δ is SWAGX minus VTI, in percentage points. Sector data is not published by every issuer, so “Unclassified” is a real category rather than a gap in the table.

What each fund holds alone

Only in SWAGX
1,603 positions

98.9% of SWAGX by weight, held in no part of VTI.

Only in VTI
3,494 positions

99.4% of VTI by weight, held in no part of SWAGX.

A large count with a small weight is the usual shape: the positions one fund adds are typically its smallest ones.

Concentration and cost

SWAGXVTI
Top 10 holdings71.4%31.9%
Positions held1,6043,495
Cost per $10,000 held, per year$4$3

Cost is the expense ratio applied to $10,000; it excludes any brokerage commission, bid-ask spread or tax consequence. Figures are facts about the funds, not a suggestion about which to hold.

Frequently asked

How much do SWAGX and VTI overlap?

SWAGX and VTI overlap 0.6% by portfolio weight — largely distinct portfolios. They share 1 holdings. The figure comes from current issuer holdings files (SWAGX as of 2026-02-28, VTI as of 2026-06-30).

How is the overlap between SWAGX and VTI calculated?

As the sum of the smaller weight in each fund, over every holding both funds own: Σ min(wA, wB). If SWAGX holds a stock at 6% and VTI holds the same stock at 4%, 4% counts as shared. The result is bounded between 0% and 100%, and it is computed after looking through any fund-of-funds to the underlying holdings.

Is it redundant to hold both SWAGX and VTI?

That depends on your goals — we state facts, not advice. At 0.6% overlap, each fund still contributes meaningfully distinct exposure.

What does SWAGX own that VTI doesn't?

SWAGX holds 1,604 positions and VTI holds 3,495; 1,603 of SWAGX's positions don't appear in VTI at all, and they are 98.9% of SWAGX by weight.

You probably hold more than two funds

This page compares SWAGX and VTI. Paste your whole portfolio — brokerage, 401(k), IRA — and see the overlap across every fund at once, plus what you actually own underneath them and your own Effective Funds number. Free, no account, nothing stored.

X-ray my portfolio — free →

Watch SWAGX vs VTI

We re-read both funds’ published holdings every weeknight. Leave an address and we'll tell you when what's inside actually changes.

Not sending yet — email alerts are built but switched off, and you'll be among the first when they turn on. No spam, one-click unsubscribe.

Related comparisons

Sources: issuer holdings files, SWAGX as of 2026-02-28, VTI as of 2026-06-30. Weights are fractions of each fund. Diagnostics, not advice.