MUB vs VTHRX: 0% overlap
iShares National Muni Bond ETF and Vanguard Target Retirement 2030 share 0.1% of their portfolios by weight — computed as Σ min(wA, wB) over every holding both funds own.
Different holding dates. These holdings were published about 4 months apart — VTHRX as of 2026-03-31, the rest through 2026-07-23. Each fund is compared using its most recent file, so any trading in between shows up as a difference.
You would hold two tickers and get the diversification of 2.0. Two funds that shared nothing would score 2.0; two identical funds score 1.0.
Top shared holdings
MUB and VTHRX hold 76 of the same securities. The ten contributing most to the overlap figure:
| Holding | in MUB | in VTHRX | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|
| 73358W | 0.2% | 0.0% | 0.2% |
| 13063D | 2.7% | 0.0% | 2.7% |
| 646139 | 0.1% | 0.0% | 0.1% |
| 072024 | 0.4% | 0.0% | 0.4% |
| 64966S | 1.1% | 0.0% | 1.1% |
| 64966Q | 1.3% | 0.0% | 1.3% |
| 915217 | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| 64972F | 0.1% | 0.0% | 0.1% |
| 626207 | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| 02765U | 0.1% | 0.0% | 0.1% |
Where MUB and VTHRX differ
Sector weights as a share of each fund, ordered by the size of the gap rather than the size of the sector — two funds that overlap heavily still usually diverge somewhere.
| Sector | MUB | VTHRX | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|
| State Tax-Backed | 30.7% | 0.0% | +30.7pp |
| Information Technology | 0.0% | 17.3% | −17.3pp |
| Local Tax-Backed | 14.9% | 0.0% | +14.9pp |
| Utilities | 16.8% | 2.2% | +14.5pp |
| Treasuries | 0.0% | 13.6% | −13.6pp |
| Unclassified | 0.0% | 13.3% | −13.3pp |
| Financials | 0.0% | 11.3% | −11.3pp |
| School Districts | 10.2% | 0.0% | +10.2pp |
Δ is MUB minus VTHRX, in percentage points. Sector data is not published by every issuer, so “Unclassified” is a real category rather than a gap in the table.
What each fund holds alone
75.4% of MUB by weight, held in no part of VTHRX.
97.9% of VTHRX by weight, held in no part of MUB.
A large count with a small weight is the usual shape: the positions one fund adds are typically its smallest ones.
Concentration and cost
| MUB | VTHRX | |
|---|---|---|
| Top 10 holdings | 17.2% | 28.9% |
| Positions held | 969 | 7 |
| Cost per $10,000 held, per year | $5 | $8 |
Cost is the expense ratio applied to $10,000; it excludes any brokerage commission, bid-ask spread or tax consequence. Figures are facts about the funds, not a suggestion about which to hold.
Frequently asked
How much do MUB and VTHRX overlap?
MUB and VTHRX overlap 0.1% by portfolio weight — largely distinct portfolios. They share 76 holdings. The figure comes from current issuer holdings files (MUB as of 2026-07-23, VTHRX as of 2026-03-31).
How is the overlap between MUB and VTHRX calculated?
As the sum of the smaller weight in each fund, over every holding both funds own: Σ min(wA, wB). If MUB holds a stock at 6% and VTHRX holds the same stock at 4%, 4% counts as shared. The result is bounded between 0% and 100%, and it is computed after looking through any fund-of-funds to the underlying holdings.
Is it redundant to hold both MUB and VTHRX?
That depends on your goals — we state facts, not advice. At 0.1% overlap, each fund still contributes meaningfully distinct exposure.
What does MUB own that VTHRX doesn't?
MUB holds 969 positions and VTHRX holds 7; 892 of MUB's positions don't appear in VTHRX at all, and they are 75.4% of MUB by weight.
You probably hold more than two funds
This page compares MUB and VTHRX. Paste your whole portfolio — brokerage, 401(k), IRA — and see the overlap across every fund at once, plus what you actually own underneath them and your own Effective Funds number. Free, no account, nothing stored.
X-ray my portfolio — free →Watch MUB vs VTHRX
We re-read both funds’ published holdings every weeknight. Leave an address and we'll tell you when what's inside actually changes.
Not sending yet — email alerts are built but switched off, and you'll be among the first when they turn on. No spam, one-click unsubscribe.
Related comparisons
Sources: issuer holdings files, MUB as of 2026-07-23, VTHRX as of 2026-03-31. Weights are fractions of each fund. Diagnostics, not advice.