SCHF vs SWAGX: 1% overlap

Schwab International Equity ETF and Schwab U.S. Aggregate Bond Index share 0.5% of their portfolios by weight — computed as Σ min(wA, wB) over every holding both funds own.

Different holding dates. These holdings were published about 3 months apart — SWAGX as of 2026-02-28, the rest through 2026-05-31. Each fund is compared using its most recent file, so any trading in between shows up as a difference.

Hold both, 50/50
2.0Effective Funds

You would hold two tickers and get the diversification of 2.0. Two funds that shared nothing would score 2.0; two identical funds score 1.0.

Overlap
0.5%
SCHF expense ratio
0.06%
SWAGX expense ratio
0.04%

Top shared holdings

SCHF and SWAGX hold 1 of the same securities. The ten contributing most to the overlap figure:

Holdingin SCHFin SWAGXΔ
CASH0.5%2.1%1.5%

Where SCHF and SWAGX differ

Sector weights as a share of each fund, ordered by the size of the gap rather than the size of the sector — two funds that overlap heavily still usually diverge somewhere.

SectorSCHFSWAGXΔ
Unclassified95.9%6.5%+89.3pp
Treasuries0.0%45.7%45.7pp
MBS Pass-Through0.0%19.2%19.2pp
Corporate — industrial & other0.0%13.3%13.3pp
Financials1.9%7.5%5.6pp
Utilities0.1%2.3%2.2pp
Cash and/or Derivatives0.5%2.1%1.6pp
Supranational0.1%1.3%1.2pp

Δ is SCHF minus SWAGX, in percentage points. Sector data is not published by every issuer, so “Unclassified” is a real category rather than a gap in the table.

What each fund holds alone

Only in SCHF
1,475 positions

99.3% of SCHF by weight, held in no part of SWAGX.

Only in SWAGX
1,603 positions

98.9% of SWAGX by weight, held in no part of SCHF.

A large count with a small weight is the usual shape: the positions one fund adds are typically its smallest ones.

Concentration and cost

SCHFSWAGX
Top 10 holdings14.8%71.4%
Positions held1,4771,604
Cost per $10,000 held, per year$6$4

Cost is the expense ratio applied to $10,000; it excludes any brokerage commission, bid-ask spread or tax consequence. Figures are facts about the funds, not a suggestion about which to hold.

Frequently asked

How much do SCHF and SWAGX overlap?

SCHF and SWAGX overlap 0.5% by portfolio weight — largely distinct portfolios. They share 1 holdings. The figure comes from current issuer holdings files (SCHF as of 2026-05-31, SWAGX as of 2026-02-28).

How is the overlap between SCHF and SWAGX calculated?

As the sum of the smaller weight in each fund, over every holding both funds own: Σ min(wA, wB). If SCHF holds a stock at 6% and SWAGX holds the same stock at 4%, 4% counts as shared. The result is bounded between 0% and 100%, and it is computed after looking through any fund-of-funds to the underlying holdings.

Is it redundant to hold both SCHF and SWAGX?

That depends on your goals — we state facts, not advice. At 0.5% overlap, each fund still contributes meaningfully distinct exposure.

What does SCHF own that SWAGX doesn't?

SCHF holds 1,477 positions and SWAGX holds 1,604; 1,475 of SCHF's positions don't appear in SWAGX at all, and they are 99.3% of SCHF by weight.

You probably hold more than two funds

This page compares SCHF and SWAGX. Paste your whole portfolio — brokerage, 401(k), IRA — and see the overlap across every fund at once, plus what you actually own underneath them and your own Effective Funds number. Free, no account, nothing stored.

X-ray my portfolio — free →

Watch SCHF vs SWAGX

We re-read both funds’ published holdings every weeknight. Leave an address and we'll tell you when what's inside actually changes.

Not sending yet — email alerts are built but switched off, and you'll be among the first when they turn on. No spam, one-click unsubscribe.

Related comparisons

Sources: issuer holdings files, SCHF as of 2026-05-31, SWAGX as of 2026-02-28. Weights are fractions of each fund. Diagnostics, not advice.