SCHG vs VEA: 0% overlap
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF and Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF share 0.3% of their portfolios by weight — computed as Σ min(wA, wB) over every holding both funds own.
Different holding dates. These holdings were published 30 days apart — SCHG as of 2026-05-31, the rest through 2026-06-30. Each fund is compared using its most recent file, so any trading in between shows up as a difference.
You would hold two tickers and get the diversification of 2.0. Two funds that shared nothing would score 2.0; two identical funds score 1.0.
Top shared holdings
SCHG and VEA hold 8 of the same securities. The ten contributing most to the overlap figure:
| Holding | in SCHG | in VEA | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|
| ROP | 0.1% | 0.9% | 0.8% |
| HEI | 0.1% | 0.1% | 0.0% |
| CASH | 0.1% | 1.4% | 1.3% |
| CSL | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% |
| AAL | 0.0% | 0.2% | 0.1% |
| EFX | 0.1% | 0.0% | 0.1% |
| TKO | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| HUM | 0.1% | 0.0% | 0.1% |
Where SCHG and VEA differ
Sector weights as a share of each fund, ordered by the size of the gap rather than the size of the sector — two funds that overlap heavily still usually diverge somewhere.
| Sector | SCHG | VEA | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Information Technology | 46.1% | 17.1% | +29.0pp |
| Financials | 6.8% | 20.7% | −14.0pp |
| Communication Services | 14.7% | 2.5% | +12.2pp |
| Industrials | 6.0% | 16.9% | −10.9pp |
| Unclassified | 1.9% | 8.9% | −7.0pp |
| Consumer Discretionary | 12.1% | 7.3% | +4.8pp |
| Materials | 0.6% | 5.1% | −4.4pp |
| Consumer Staples | 1.7% | 5.6% | −3.9pp |
Δ is SCHG minus VEA, in percentage points. Sector data is not published by every issuer, so “Unclassified” is a real category rather than a gap in the table.
What each fund holds alone
99.3% of SCHG by weight, held in no part of VEA.
97.4% of VEA by weight, held in no part of SCHG.
A large count with a small weight is the usual shape: the positions one fund adds are typically its smallest ones.
Concentration and cost
| SCHG | VEA | |
|---|---|---|
| Top 10 holdings | 57.2% | 15.2% |
| Positions held | 195 | 3,792 |
| Cost per $10,000 held, per year | $4 | $3 |
Cost is the expense ratio applied to $10,000; it excludes any brokerage commission, bid-ask spread or tax consequence. Figures are facts about the funds, not a suggestion about which to hold.
Frequently asked
How much do SCHG and VEA overlap?
SCHG and VEA overlap 0.3% by portfolio weight — largely distinct portfolios. They share 8 holdings. The figure comes from current issuer holdings files (SCHG as of 2026-05-31, VEA as of 2026-06-30).
How is the overlap between SCHG and VEA calculated?
As the sum of the smaller weight in each fund, over every holding both funds own: Σ min(wA, wB). If SCHG holds a stock at 6% and VEA holds the same stock at 4%, 4% counts as shared. The result is bounded between 0% and 100%, and it is computed after looking through any fund-of-funds to the underlying holdings.
Is it redundant to hold both SCHG and VEA?
That depends on your goals — we state facts, not advice. At 0.3% overlap, each fund still contributes meaningfully distinct exposure.
What does SCHG own that VEA doesn't?
SCHG holds 195 positions and VEA holds 3,792; 186 of SCHG's positions don't appear in VEA at all, and they are 99.3% of SCHG by weight.
You probably hold more than two funds
This page compares SCHG and VEA. Paste your whole portfolio — brokerage, 401(k), IRA — and see the overlap across every fund at once, plus what you actually own underneath them and your own Effective Funds number. Free, no account, nothing stored.
X-ray my portfolio — free →Watch SCHG vs VEA
We re-read both funds’ published holdings every weeknight. Leave an address and we'll tell you when what's inside actually changes.
Not sending yet — email alerts are built but switched off, and you'll be among the first when they turn on. No spam, one-click unsubscribe.
Related comparisons
Sources: issuer holdings files, SCHG as of 2026-05-31, VEA as of 2026-06-30. Weights are fractions of each fund. Diagnostics, not advice.