SWAGX vs TSPF: 46% overlap

Schwab U.S. Aggregate Bond Index and TSP F Fund — shown via aggregate-bond proxy share 46.1% of their portfolios by weight — computed as Σ min(wA, wB) over every holding both funds own.

Different holding dates. These holdings were published about 5 months apart — SWAGX as of 2026-02-28, the rest through 2026-07-23. Each fund is compared using its most recent file, so any trading in between shows up as a difference.

Hold both, 50/50
1.5Effective Funds

You would hold two tickers and get the diversification of 1.5. Two funds that shared nothing would score 2.0; two identical funds score 1.0.

Overlap
46.1%
SWAGX expense ratio
0.04%
TSPF expense ratio
0.05%

Top shared holdings

SWAGX and TSPF hold 1,464 of the same securities. The ten contributing most to the overlap figure:

Holdingin SWAGXin TSPFΔ
AGENCY-MBS19.2%24.1%4.8%
CASH2.1%2.7%0.6%
46647P0.5%0.5%0.0%
06051G0.5%0.5%0.0%
38141G0.3%0.3%0.0%
95000U0.3%0.3%0.0%
4590580.3%0.3%0.0%
68389X0.3%0.3%0.1%
4042800.3%0.3%0.0%
00206R0.3%0.3%0.0%

Where SWAGX and TSPF differ

Sector weights as a share of each fund, ordered by the size of the gap rather than the size of the sector — two funds that overlap heavily still usually diverge somewhere.

SectorSWAGXTSPFΔ
Unclassified6.5%0.0%+6.5pp
MBS Pass-Through19.2%24.1%4.8pp
Cash & Other0.0%-2.1%+2.1pp
Corporate — industrial & other13.3%14.3%1.0pp
Treasuries45.7%46.5%0.8pp
Cash and/or Derivatives2.1%2.7%0.6pp
Financials7.5%8.0%0.5pp
ABS0.0%0.4%0.4pp

Δ is SWAGX minus TSPF, in percentage points. Sector data is not published by every issuer, so “Unclassified” is a real category rather than a gap in the table.

What each fund holds alone

Only in SWAGX
140 positions

52.3% of SWAGX by weight, held in no part of TSPF.

Only in TSPF
399 positions

47.8% of TSPF by weight, held in no part of SWAGX.

A large count with a small weight is the usual shape: the positions one fund adds are typically its smallest ones.

Concentration and cost

SWAGXTSPF
Top 10 holdings71.4%75.3%
Positions held1,6041,864
Cost per $10,000 held, per year$4$5

Cost is the expense ratio applied to $10,000; it excludes any brokerage commission, bid-ask spread or tax consequence. Figures are facts about the funds, not a suggestion about which to hold.

Frequently asked

How much do SWAGX and TSPF overlap?

SWAGX and TSPF overlap 46.1% by portfolio weight — moderate overlap. They share 1,464 holdings. The figure comes from current issuer holdings files (SWAGX as of 2026-02-28, TSPF as of 2026-07-23).

How is the overlap between SWAGX and TSPF calculated?

As the sum of the smaller weight in each fund, over every holding both funds own: Σ min(wA, wB). If SWAGX holds a stock at 6% and TSPF holds the same stock at 4%, 4% counts as shared. The result is bounded between 0% and 100%, and it is computed after looking through any fund-of-funds to the underlying holdings.

Is it redundant to hold both SWAGX and TSPF?

That depends on your goals — we state facts, not advice. At 46.1% overlap, each fund still contributes meaningfully distinct exposure.

What does SWAGX own that TSPF doesn't?

SWAGX holds 1,604 positions and TSPF holds 1,864; 140 of SWAGX's positions don't appear in TSPF at all, and they are 52.3% of SWAGX by weight.

You probably hold more than two funds

This page compares SWAGX and TSPF. Paste your whole portfolio — brokerage, 401(k), IRA — and see the overlap across every fund at once, plus what you actually own underneath them and your own Effective Funds number. Free, no account, nothing stored.

X-ray my portfolio — free →

Watch SWAGX vs TSPF

We re-read both funds’ published holdings every weeknight. Leave an address and we'll tell you when what's inside actually changes.

Not sending yet — email alerts are built but switched off, and you'll be among the first when they turn on. No spam, one-click unsubscribe.

Related comparisons

Sources: issuer holdings files, SWAGX as of 2026-02-28, TSPF as of 2026-07-23. Weights are fractions of each fund. Diagnostics, not advice.