SWAGX vs VB: 2% overlap
Schwab U.S. Aggregate Bond Index and Vanguard Small-Cap ETF share 1.7% of their portfolios by weight — computed as Σ min(wA, wB) over every holding both funds own.
Different holding dates. These holdings were published about 4 months apart — SWAGX as of 2026-02-28, the rest through 2026-06-30. Each fund is compared using its most recent file, so any trading in between shows up as a difference.
You would hold two tickers and get the diversification of 2.0. Two funds that shared nothing would score 2.0; two identical funds score 1.0.
Top shared holdings
SWAGX and VB hold 1 of the same securities. The ten contributing most to the overlap figure:
| Holding | in SWAGX | in VB | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|
| CASH | 2.1% | 1.7% | 0.3% |
Where SWAGX and VB differ
Sector weights as a share of each fund, ordered by the size of the gap rather than the size of the sector — two funds that overlap heavily still usually diverge somewhere.
| Sector | SWAGX | VB | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Treasuries | 45.7% | 0.0% | +45.7pp |
| Industrials | 0.0% | 21.0% | −21.0pp |
| MBS Pass-Through | 19.2% | 0.0% | +19.2pp |
| Information Technology | 0.0% | 16.1% | −16.1pp |
| Corporate — industrial & other | 13.3% | 0.0% | +13.3pp |
| Health Care | 0.0% | 11.9% | −11.9pp |
| Consumer Discretionary | 0.0% | 9.9% | −9.9pp |
| Real Estate | 0.0% | 7.1% | −7.1pp |
Δ is SWAGX minus VB, in percentage points. Sector data is not published by every issuer, so “Unclassified” is a real category rather than a gap in the table.
What each fund holds alone
98.9% of SWAGX by weight, held in no part of VB.
98.3% of VB by weight, held in no part of SWAGX.
A large count with a small weight is the usual shape: the positions one fund adds are typically its smallest ones.
Concentration and cost
| SWAGX | VB | |
|---|---|---|
| Top 10 holdings | 71.4% | 5.6% |
| Positions held | 1,604 | 1,308 |
| Cost per $10,000 held, per year | $4 | $3 |
Cost is the expense ratio applied to $10,000; it excludes any brokerage commission, bid-ask spread or tax consequence. Figures are facts about the funds, not a suggestion about which to hold.
Frequently asked
How much do SWAGX and VB overlap?
SWAGX and VB overlap 1.7% by portfolio weight — largely distinct portfolios. They share 1 holdings. The figure comes from current issuer holdings files (SWAGX as of 2026-02-28, VB as of 2026-06-30).
How is the overlap between SWAGX and VB calculated?
As the sum of the smaller weight in each fund, over every holding both funds own: Σ min(wA, wB). If SWAGX holds a stock at 6% and VB holds the same stock at 4%, 4% counts as shared. The result is bounded between 0% and 100%, and it is computed after looking through any fund-of-funds to the underlying holdings.
Is it redundant to hold both SWAGX and VB?
That depends on your goals — we state facts, not advice. At 1.7% overlap, each fund still contributes meaningfully distinct exposure.
What does SWAGX own that VB doesn't?
SWAGX holds 1,604 positions and VB holds 1,308; 1,603 of SWAGX's positions don't appear in VB at all, and they are 98.9% of SWAGX by weight.
You probably hold more than two funds
This page compares SWAGX and VB. Paste your whole portfolio — brokerage, 401(k), IRA — and see the overlap across every fund at once, plus what you actually own underneath them and your own Effective Funds number. Free, no account, nothing stored.
X-ray my portfolio — free →Watch SWAGX vs VB
We re-read both funds’ published holdings every weeknight. Leave an address and we'll tell you when what's inside actually changes.
Not sending yet — email alerts are built but switched off, and you'll be among the first when they turn on. No spam, one-click unsubscribe.
Related comparisons
Sources: issuer holdings files, SWAGX as of 2026-02-28, VB as of 2026-06-30. Weights are fractions of each fund. Diagnostics, not advice.