SWAGX vs VBTLX: 45% overlap

Schwab U.S. Aggregate Bond Index and Vanguard Total Bond Market Index Admiral share 45.4% of their portfolios by weight — computed as Σ min(wA, wB) over every holding both funds own.

Different holding dates. These holdings were published about 4 months apart — SWAGX as of 2026-02-28, the rest through 2026-06-30. Each fund is compared using its most recent file, so any trading in between shows up as a difference.

Hold both, 50/50
1.5Effective Funds

You would hold two tickers and get the diversification of 1.5. Two funds that shared nothing would score 2.0; two identical funds score 1.0.

Overlap
45.4%
SWAGX expense ratio
0.04%
VBTLX expense ratio
0.04%

Top shared holdings

SWAGX and VBTLX hold 1,449 of the same securities. The ten contributing most to the overlap figure:

Holdingin SWAGXin VBTLXΔ
AGENCY-MBS19.2%20.3%1.1%
CASH2.1%1.1%1.0%
46647P0.5%0.6%0.1%
06051G0.5%0.5%0.0%
4590580.3%0.4%0.0%
2987850.3%0.3%0.0%
38141G0.3%0.3%0.0%
68389X0.3%0.3%0.1%
95000U0.3%0.3%0.0%
4042800.3%0.3%0.0%

Where SWAGX and VBTLX differ

Sector weights as a share of each fund, ordered by the size of the gap rather than the size of the sector — two funds that overlap heavily still usually diverge somewhere.

SectorSWAGXVBTLXΔ
Unclassified6.5%0.7%+5.8pp
Treasuries45.7%48.2%2.5pp
Corporate — industrial & other13.3%14.6%1.4pp
MBS Pass-Through19.2%20.3%1.1pp
Cash and/or Derivatives2.1%1.1%+1.0pp
Financials7.5%7.9%0.4pp
Utilities2.3%2.6%0.3pp
ABS0.0%0.3%0.3pp

Δ is SWAGX minus VBTLX, in percentage points. Sector data is not published by every issuer, so “Unclassified” is a real category rather than a gap in the table.

What each fund holds alone

Only in SWAGX
155 positions

51.9% of SWAGX by weight, held in no part of VBTLX.

Only in VBTLX
598 positions

49.7% of VBTLX by weight, held in no part of SWAGX.

A large count with a small weight is the usual shape: the positions one fund adds are typically its smallest ones.

Concentration and cost

SWAGXVBTLX
Top 10 holdings71.4%71.7%
Positions held1,6042,047
Cost per $10,000 held, per year$4$4

Cost is the expense ratio applied to $10,000; it excludes any brokerage commission, bid-ask spread or tax consequence. Figures are facts about the funds, not a suggestion about which to hold.

Frequently asked

How much do SWAGX and VBTLX overlap?

SWAGX and VBTLX overlap 45.4% by portfolio weight — moderate overlap. They share 1,449 holdings. The figure comes from current issuer holdings files (SWAGX as of 2026-02-28, VBTLX as of 2026-06-30).

How is the overlap between SWAGX and VBTLX calculated?

As the sum of the smaller weight in each fund, over every holding both funds own: Σ min(wA, wB). If SWAGX holds a stock at 6% and VBTLX holds the same stock at 4%, 4% counts as shared. The result is bounded between 0% and 100%, and it is computed after looking through any fund-of-funds to the underlying holdings.

Is it redundant to hold both SWAGX and VBTLX?

That depends on your goals — we state facts, not advice. At 45.4% overlap, each fund still contributes meaningfully distinct exposure.

What does SWAGX own that VBTLX doesn't?

SWAGX holds 1,604 positions and VBTLX holds 2,047; 155 of SWAGX's positions don't appear in VBTLX at all, and they are 51.9% of SWAGX by weight.

You probably hold more than two funds

This page compares SWAGX and VBTLX. Paste your whole portfolio — brokerage, 401(k), IRA — and see the overlap across every fund at once, plus what you actually own underneath them and your own Effective Funds number. Free, no account, nothing stored.

X-ray my portfolio — free →

Watch SWAGX vs VBTLX

We re-read both funds’ published holdings every weeknight. Leave an address and we'll tell you when what's inside actually changes.

Not sending yet — email alerts are built but switched off, and you'll be among the first when they turn on. No spam, one-click unsubscribe.

Related comparisons

Sources: issuer holdings files, SWAGX as of 2026-02-28, VBTLX as of 2026-06-30. Weights are fractions of each fund. Diagnostics, not advice.