SWAGX vs VCSH: 22% overlap

Schwab U.S. Aggregate Bond Index and Vanguard Short-Term Corporate Bond ETF share 21.9% of their portfolios by weight — computed as Σ min(wA, wB) over every holding both funds own.

Different holding dates. These holdings were published about 4 months apart — SWAGX as of 2026-02-28, the rest through 2026-06-30. Each fund is compared using its most recent file, so any trading in between shows up as a difference.

Hold both, 50/50
1.8Effective Funds

You would hold two tickers and get the diversification of 1.8. Two funds that shared nothing would score 2.0; two identical funds score 1.0.

Overlap
21.9%
SWAGX expense ratio
0.04%
VCSH expense ratio
0.03%

Top shared holdings

SWAGX and VCSH hold 892 of the same securities. The ten contributing most to the overlap figure:

Holdingin SWAGXin VCSHΔ
CASH2.1%1.1%1.0%
46647P0.5%2.7%2.2%
06051G0.5%2.4%1.9%
38141G0.3%1.5%1.2%
95000U0.3%1.4%1.1%
68389X0.3%0.9%0.6%
4042800.3%1.6%1.3%
1729670.3%1.1%0.9%
00206R0.3%0.5%0.2%
61747Y0.2%1.0%0.7%

Where SWAGX and VCSH differ

Sector weights as a share of each fund, ordered by the size of the gap rather than the size of the sector — two funds that overlap heavily still usually diverge somewhere.

SectorSWAGXVCSHΔ
Treasuries45.7%0.4%+45.3pp
Corporate — industrial & other13.3%50.5%37.2pp
Financials7.5%40.5%33.0pp
MBS Pass-Through19.2%0.0%+19.2pp
Unclassified6.5%0.3%+6.2pp
Utilities2.3%7.3%4.9pp
Supranational1.3%0.0%+1.3pp
Sovereign1.1%0.0%+1.1pp

Δ is SWAGX minus VCSH, in percentage points. Sector data is not published by every issuer, so “Unclassified” is a real category rather than a gap in the table.

What each fund holds alone

Only in SWAGX
712 positions

77.6% of SWAGX by weight, held in no part of VCSH.

Only in VCSH
41 positions

2.0% of VCSH by weight, held in no part of SWAGX.

A large count with a small weight is the usual shape: the positions one fund adds are typically its smallest ones.

Concentration and cost

SWAGXVCSH
Top 10 holdings71.4%14.7%
Positions held1,604933
Cost per $10,000 held, per year$4$3

Cost is the expense ratio applied to $10,000; it excludes any brokerage commission, bid-ask spread or tax consequence. Figures are facts about the funds, not a suggestion about which to hold.

Frequently asked

How much do SWAGX and VCSH overlap?

SWAGX and VCSH overlap 21.9% by portfolio weight — moderate overlap. They share 892 holdings. The figure comes from current issuer holdings files (SWAGX as of 2026-02-28, VCSH as of 2026-06-30).

How is the overlap between SWAGX and VCSH calculated?

As the sum of the smaller weight in each fund, over every holding both funds own: Σ min(wA, wB). If SWAGX holds a stock at 6% and VCSH holds the same stock at 4%, 4% counts as shared. The result is bounded between 0% and 100%, and it is computed after looking through any fund-of-funds to the underlying holdings.

Is it redundant to hold both SWAGX and VCSH?

That depends on your goals — we state facts, not advice. At 21.9% overlap, each fund still contributes meaningfully distinct exposure.

What does SWAGX own that VCSH doesn't?

SWAGX holds 1,604 positions and VCSH holds 933; 712 of SWAGX's positions don't appear in VCSH at all, and they are 77.6% of SWAGX by weight.

You probably hold more than two funds

This page compares SWAGX and VCSH. Paste your whole portfolio — brokerage, 401(k), IRA — and see the overlap across every fund at once, plus what you actually own underneath them and your own Effective Funds number. Free, no account, nothing stored.

X-ray my portfolio — free →

Watch SWAGX vs VCSH

We re-read both funds’ published holdings every weeknight. Leave an address and we'll tell you when what's inside actually changes.

Not sending yet — email alerts are built but switched off, and you'll be among the first when they turn on. No spam, one-click unsubscribe.

Related comparisons

Sources: issuer holdings files, SWAGX as of 2026-02-28, VCSH as of 2026-06-30. Weights are fractions of each fund. Diagnostics, not advice.