VBR vs XLC: 1% overlap
Vanguard Small-Cap Value ETF and Communication Services Select Sector SPDR Fund share 1.1% of their portfolios by weight — computed as Σ min(wA, wB) over every holding both funds own.
Different holding dates. These holdings were published 27 days apart — VBR as of 2026-06-30, the rest through 2026-07-27. Each fund is compared using its most recent file, so any trading in between shows up as a difference.
You would hold two tickers and get the diversification of 2.0. Two funds that shared nothing would score 2.0; two identical funds score 1.0.
Top shared holdings
VBR and XLC hold 7 of the same securities. The ten contributing most to the overlap figure:
| Holding | in VBR | in XLC | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|
| OMC | 0.4% | 4.4% | 3.9% |
| NWSA | 0.2% | 1.8% | 1.7% |
| ECHO | 0.1% | 2.2% | 2.0% |
| CHTR | 0.1% | 2.0% | 1.9% |
| PSKY | 0.1% | 0.5% | 0.4% |
| NWS | 0.1% | 0.7% | 0.6% |
| CASH | 0.8% | 0.0% | 0.8% |
Where VBR and XLC differ
Sector weights as a share of each fund, ordered by the size of the gap rather than the size of the sector — two funds that overlap heavily still usually diverge somewhere.
| Sector | VBR | XLC | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Communication Services | 2.4% | 99.8% | −97.4pp |
| Industrials | 18.8% | 0.0% | +18.8pp |
| Financials | 18.3% | 0.0% | +18.3pp |
| Consumer Discretionary | 11.4% | 0.0% | +11.4pp |
| Real Estate | 9.8% | 0.0% | +9.8pp |
| Information Technology | 9.4% | 0.0% | +9.4pp |
| Health Care | 8.0% | 0.0% | +8.0pp |
| Materials | 7.2% | 0.0% | +7.2pp |
Δ is VBR minus XLC, in percentage points. Sector data is not published by every issuer, so “Unclassified” is a real category rather than a gap in the table.
What each fund holds alone
98.2% of VBR by weight, held in no part of XLC.
88.2% of XLC by weight, held in no part of VBR.
A large count with a small weight is the usual shape: the positions one fund adds are typically its smallest ones.
Concentration and cost
| VBR | XLC | |
|---|---|---|
| Top 10 holdings | 6.2% | 68.5% |
| Positions held | 839 | 25 |
| Cost per $10,000 held, per year | $5 | $8 |
Cost is the expense ratio applied to $10,000; it excludes any brokerage commission, bid-ask spread or tax consequence. Figures are facts about the funds, not a suggestion about which to hold.
Frequently asked
How much do VBR and XLC overlap?
VBR and XLC overlap 1.1% by portfolio weight — largely distinct portfolios. They share 7 holdings. The figure comes from current issuer holdings files (VBR as of 2026-06-30, XLC as of 2026-07-27).
How is the overlap between VBR and XLC calculated?
As the sum of the smaller weight in each fund, over every holding both funds own: Σ min(wA, wB). If VBR holds a stock at 6% and XLC holds the same stock at 4%, 4% counts as shared. The result is bounded between 0% and 100%, and it is computed after looking through any fund-of-funds to the underlying holdings.
Is it redundant to hold both VBR and XLC?
That depends on your goals — we state facts, not advice. At 1.1% overlap, each fund still contributes meaningfully distinct exposure.
What does VBR own that XLC doesn't?
VBR holds 839 positions and XLC holds 25; 832 of VBR's positions don't appear in XLC at all, and they are 98.2% of VBR by weight.
You probably hold more than two funds
This page compares VBR and XLC. Paste your whole portfolio — brokerage, 401(k), IRA — and see the overlap across every fund at once, plus what you actually own underneath them and your own Effective Funds number. Free, no account, nothing stored.
X-ray my portfolio — free →Watch VBR vs XLC
We re-read both funds’ published holdings every weeknight. Leave an address and we'll tell you when what's inside actually changes.
Not sending yet — email alerts are built but switched off, and you'll be among the first when they turn on. No spam, one-click unsubscribe.
Related comparisons
Sources: issuer holdings files, VBR as of 2026-06-30, XLC as of 2026-07-27. Weights are fractions of each fund. Diagnostics, not advice.