VEA vs VYM: 2% overlap
Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF share 2.0% of their portfolios by weight — computed as Σ min(wA, wB) over every holding both funds own.
You would hold two tickers and get the diversification of 2.0. Two funds that shared nothing would score 2.0; two identical funds score 1.0.
Top shared holdings
VEA and VYM hold 73 of the same securities. The ten contributing most to the overlap figure:
| Holding | in VEA | in VYM | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|
| CASH | 1.4% | 0.5% | 0.9% |
| DTE | 0.3% | 0.1% | 0.2% |
| PRU | 0.1% | 0.2% | 0.0% |
| DG | 0.2% | 0.1% | 0.1% |
| PPL | 0.1% | 0.1% | 0.0% |
| EL | 0.2% | 0.1% | 0.1% |
| ALL | 0.1% | 0.3% | 0.2% |
| TSCO | 0.1% | 0.1% | 0.0% |
| MRK | 0.1% | 1.3% | 1.3% |
| HBAN | 0.1% | 0.1% | 0.1% |
Where VEA and VYM differ
Sector weights as a share of each fund, ordered by the size of the gap rather than the size of the sector — two funds that overlap heavily still usually diverge somewhere.
| Sector | VEA | VYM | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Unclassified | 8.9% | 0.0% | +8.8pp |
| Health Care | 6.2% | 13.1% | −6.9pp |
| Energy | 2.9% | 8.5% | −5.6pp |
| Industrials | 16.9% | 13.2% | +3.6pp |
| Consumer Staples | 5.6% | 8.0% | −2.4pp |
| Utilities | 3.3% | 5.7% | −2.4pp |
| Real Estate | 2.0% | 0.0% | +2.0pp |
| Materials | 5.1% | 3.7% | +1.4pp |
Δ is VEA minus VYM, in percentage points. Sector data is not published by every issuer, so “Unclassified” is a real category rather than a gap in the table.
What each fund holds alone
94.8% of VEA by weight, held in no part of VYM.
89.5% of VYM by weight, held in no part of VEA.
A large count with a small weight is the usual shape: the positions one fund adds are typically its smallest ones.
Concentration and cost
| VEA | VYM | |
|---|---|---|
| Top 10 holdings | 15.2% | 26.0% |
| Positions held | 3,792 | 606 |
| Cost per $10,000 held, per year | $3 | $4 |
Cost is the expense ratio applied to $10,000; it excludes any brokerage commission, bid-ask spread or tax consequence. Figures are facts about the funds, not a suggestion about which to hold.
Frequently asked
How much do VEA and VYM overlap?
VEA and VYM overlap 2.0% by portfolio weight — largely distinct portfolios. They share 73 holdings. The figure comes from current issuer holdings files (VEA as of 2026-06-30, VYM as of 2026-06-30).
How is the overlap between VEA and VYM calculated?
As the sum of the smaller weight in each fund, over every holding both funds own: Σ min(wA, wB). If VEA holds a stock at 6% and VYM holds the same stock at 4%, 4% counts as shared. The result is bounded between 0% and 100%, and it is computed after looking through any fund-of-funds to the underlying holdings.
Is it redundant to hold both VEA and VYM?
That depends on your goals — we state facts, not advice. At 2.0% overlap, each fund still contributes meaningfully distinct exposure.
What does VEA own that VYM doesn't?
VEA holds 3,792 positions and VYM holds 606; 3,719 of VEA's positions don't appear in VYM at all, and they are 94.8% of VEA by weight.
You probably hold more than two funds
This page compares VEA and VYM. Paste your whole portfolio — brokerage, 401(k), IRA — and see the overlap across every fund at once, plus what you actually own underneath them and your own Effective Funds number. Free, no account, nothing stored.
X-ray my portfolio — free →Watch VEA vs VYM
We re-read both funds’ published holdings every weeknight. Leave an address and we'll tell you when what's inside actually changes.
Not sending yet — email alerts are built but switched off, and you'll be among the first when they turn on. No spam, one-click unsubscribe.
Related comparisons
Sources: issuer holdings files, VEA as of 2026-06-30, VYM as of 2026-06-30. Weights are fractions of each fund. Diagnostics, not advice.