VT vs VUG: 33% overlap
Vanguard Total World Stock ETF and Vanguard Growth ETF share 32.8% of their portfolios by weight — computed as Σ min(wA, wB) over every holding both funds own.
You would hold two tickers and get the diversification of 1.7. Two funds that shared nothing would score 2.0; two identical funds score 1.0.
Top shared holdings
VT and VUG hold 144 of the same securities. The ten contributing most to the overlap figure:
| Holding | in VT | in VUG | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDA | 4.0% | 12.6% | 8.6% |
| AAPL | 3.6% | 11.6% | 8.1% |
| MSFT | 2.4% | 7.6% | 5.2% |
| AMZN | 2.0% | 4.5% | 2.5% |
| GOOGL | 1.8% | 5.7% | 3.9% |
| AVGO | 1.5% | 4.3% | 2.8% |
| GOOG | 1.4% | 4.5% | 3.1% |
| META | 1.1% | 3.4% | 2.3% |
| TSLA | 1.1% | 3.3% | 2.2% |
| LLY | 0.8% | 2.8% | 2.0% |
Where VT and VUG differ
Sector weights as a share of each fund, ordered by the size of the gap rather than the size of the sector — two funds that overlap heavily still usually diverge somewhere.
| Sector | VT | VUG | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Information Technology | 30.1% | 56.0% | −25.9pp |
| Financials | 14.9% | 3.9% | +10.9pp |
| Communication Services | 7.0% | 15.3% | −8.3pp |
| Industrials | 11.5% | 5.0% | +6.5pp |
| Unclassified | 3.8% | 0.1% | +3.6pp |
| Consumer Staples | 4.6% | 1.4% | +3.2pp |
| Health Care | 7.7% | 4.7% | +3.0pp |
| Consumer Discretionary | 8.6% | 11.4% | −2.8pp |
Δ is VT minus VUG, in percentage points. Sector data is not published by every issuer, so “Unclassified” is a real category rather than a gap in the table.
What each fund holds alone
66.6% of VT by weight, held in no part of VUG.
0.1% of VUG by weight, held in no part of VT.
A large count with a small weight is the usual shape: the positions one fund adds are typically its smallest ones.
Concentration and cost
| VT | VUG | |
|---|---|---|
| Top 10 holdings | 20.5% | 60.3% |
| Positions held | 9,600 | 147 |
| Cost per $10,000 held, per year | $6 | $3 |
Cost is the expense ratio applied to $10,000; it excludes any brokerage commission, bid-ask spread or tax consequence. Figures are facts about the funds, not a suggestion about which to hold.
Frequently asked
How much do VT and VUG overlap?
VT and VUG overlap 32.8% by portfolio weight — moderate overlap. They share 144 holdings. The figure comes from current issuer holdings files (VT as of 2026-06-30, VUG as of 2026-06-30).
How is the overlap between VT and VUG calculated?
As the sum of the smaller weight in each fund, over every holding both funds own: Σ min(wA, wB). If VT holds a stock at 6% and VUG holds the same stock at 4%, 4% counts as shared. The result is bounded between 0% and 100%, and it is computed after looking through any fund-of-funds to the underlying holdings.
Is it redundant to hold both VT and VUG?
That depends on your goals — we state facts, not advice. At 32.8% overlap, each fund still contributes meaningfully distinct exposure.
What does VT own that VUG doesn't?
VT holds 9,600 positions and VUG holds 147; 9,456 of VT's positions don't appear in VUG at all, and they are 66.6% of VT by weight.
You probably hold more than two funds
This page compares VT and VUG. Paste your whole portfolio — brokerage, 401(k), IRA — and see the overlap across every fund at once, plus what you actually own underneath them and your own Effective Funds number. Free, no account, nothing stored.
X-ray my portfolio — free →Watch VT vs VUG
We re-read both funds’ published holdings every weeknight. Leave an address and we'll tell you when what's inside actually changes.
Not sending yet — email alerts are built but switched off, and you'll be among the first when they turn on. No spam, one-click unsubscribe.
Related comparisons
Sources: issuer holdings files, VT as of 2026-06-30, VUG as of 2026-06-30. Weights are fractions of each fund. Diagnostics, not advice.