SWAGX vs VTHRX: 16% overlap

Schwab U.S. Aggregate Bond Index and Vanguard Target Retirement 2030 share 16.0% of their portfolios by weight — computed as Σ min(wA, wB) over every holding both funds own.

Different holding dates. These holdings were published about 4 months apart — SWAGX as of 2026-02-28, the rest through 2026-06-30. Each fund is compared using its most recent file, so any trading in between shows up as a difference.

Hold both, 50/50
1.8Effective Funds

You would hold two tickers and get the diversification of 1.8. Two funds that shared nothing would score 2.0; two identical funds score 1.0.

Overlap
16.0%
SWAGX expense ratio
0.04%
VTHRX expense ratio
0.08%

Top shared holdings

SWAGX and VTHRX hold 1,451 of the same securities. The ten contributing most to the overlap figure:

Holdingin SWAGXin VTHRXΔ
AGENCY-MBS19.2%5.7%13.5%
CASH2.1%1.9%0.2%
46647P0.5%0.2%0.3%
06051G0.5%0.1%0.3%
4590580.3%0.1%0.2%
68389X0.3%0.1%0.2%
0231350.2%0.1%0.1%
2987850.3%0.1%0.2%
38141G0.3%0.1%0.2%
00206R0.3%0.1%0.2%

Where SWAGX and VTHRX differ

Sector weights as a share of each fund, ordered by the size of the gap rather than the size of the sector — two funds that overlap heavily still usually diverge somewhere.

SectorSWAGXVTHRXΔ
Treasuries45.7%13.6%+32.1pp
Information Technology0.0%17.3%17.3pp
MBS Pass-Through19.2%5.7%+13.5pp
Corporate — industrial & other13.3%4.4%+8.9pp
Industrials0.0%6.9%6.9pp
Unclassified6.5%13.3%6.8pp
Consumer Discretionary0.0%5.0%5.0pp
Health Care0.0%4.6%4.6pp

Δ is SWAGX minus VTHRX, in percentage points. Sector data is not published by every issuer, so “Unclassified” is a real category rather than a gap in the table.

What each fund holds alone

Only in SWAGX
153 positions

51.9% of SWAGX by weight, held in no part of VTHRX.

Only in VTHRX
15,232 positions

83.6% of VTHRX by weight, held in no part of SWAGX.

A large count with a small weight is the usual shape: the positions one fund adds are typically its smallest ones.

Concentration and cost

SWAGXVTHRX
Top 10 holdings71.4%28.9%
Positions held1,6047
Cost per $10,000 held, per year$4$8

Cost is the expense ratio applied to $10,000; it excludes any brokerage commission, bid-ask spread or tax consequence. Figures are facts about the funds, not a suggestion about which to hold.

Frequently asked

How much do SWAGX and VTHRX overlap?

SWAGX and VTHRX overlap 16.0% by portfolio weight — moderate overlap. They share 1,451 holdings. The figure comes from current issuer holdings files (SWAGX as of 2026-02-28, VTHRX as of 2026-03-31).

How is the overlap between SWAGX and VTHRX calculated?

As the sum of the smaller weight in each fund, over every holding both funds own: Σ min(wA, wB). If SWAGX holds a stock at 6% and VTHRX holds the same stock at 4%, 4% counts as shared. The result is bounded between 0% and 100%, and it is computed after looking through any fund-of-funds to the underlying holdings.

Is it redundant to hold both SWAGX and VTHRX?

That depends on your goals — we state facts, not advice. At 16.0% overlap, each fund still contributes meaningfully distinct exposure.

What does SWAGX own that VTHRX doesn't?

SWAGX holds 1,604 positions and VTHRX holds 7; 153 of SWAGX's positions don't appear in VTHRX at all, and they are 51.9% of SWAGX by weight.

You probably hold more than two funds

This page compares SWAGX and VTHRX. Paste your whole portfolio — brokerage, 401(k), IRA — and see the overlap across every fund at once, plus what you actually own underneath them and your own Effective Funds number. Free, no account, nothing stored.

X-ray my portfolio — free →

Watch SWAGX vs VTHRX

We re-read both funds’ published holdings every weeknight. Leave an address and we'll tell you when what's inside actually changes.

Not sending yet — email alerts are built but switched off, and you'll be among the first when they turn on. No spam, one-click unsubscribe.

Related comparisons

Sources: issuer holdings files, SWAGX as of 2026-02-28, VTHRX as of 2026-03-31. Weights are fractions of each fund. Diagnostics, not advice.